Without naming names: Will you vote for a candidate that belonged to a radical/extremist church, admited drug?

user and already broke his campaign promises?

Without naming names: Will you vote for a candidate that belonged to a radical/extremist church, admited drug?
MCCAIN i win





oh ya and BUSH. two points well earned
Reply:A radical extremist church. wow so using religion to validate racism isn't radical ,but pushing passed the borders of comfortability to make a point that is somewhat correct is. A better question is why did you vote for a president with a 70% GPA, who belongs to a secret society no one really knows much about. But of course that definitely makes more sense than voting for a president who ent back on a promise or two.
Reply:How convenient of you to point out Obama's past drug use as an argument against voting for him.


GWB did get elected, and he was a much worse drug and booze user than Obama has ever been, and Bush drank and drove several times, but you all forgot/forgave that because he's a born-again Christian and all that crap. Hypocrits.





Anyway. A little bit of drug use never hurt anybody. It's not like he was a meth or heroin addict. Get over it. And unlike GWB, Obama admitted to it before anyone dug it out of his past and made it public.
Reply:Which one is that, since all of them except Hillary seem to be in the drug use category and her lack of use didn't do her much good.


Cindy McCain used drugs, Bush used drugs, Bill didn't inhale, and Cheney and Bush had DUIs and Laura had a vehicular manslaughter, although she got away without charges.


There never has and never will be a candidate that didn't break at least some of his campaign promises, and snake handling Christians are at least as extremist as any Black church I've ever heard of, not to mention the polygamists.


Those may be a very sound reason for the separation of Church and state.


And for Jesus having said "let he who is without sin cast the first stone''.


Unfortunately Jesus isn't running and the rest of us have to vote for ordinary mortals who do make mistakes, lie and have not always led the exemplary lives of saints.
Reply:or an idiot that believe the US was found by Zionist





Is this the type of Church Mc_Bush attend?





A spiritual adviser of Mc_same said this:





Rod Parsley says " America's historic mission is to see Islam " destroyed "





The moron said 鈥?The USA was found on the principle of seeing Islam destroyed 鈥?





Now, what did I missed in history class?





So, the US was found by Zionist?





G Washington was a Jew?





Was Rod Parsley appointed a gay lover from Israel too?
Reply:No, and I'm not afraid to name McCain by name. He's out, but not because of his ties to extremist ministers. Many have made that mistake. It is easy in America where there are so many extremist ministers.
Reply:Wow... and here I thought you were talking about Obama. I guess I was mistaken. Then again... Bush isn't running, but I guess most libs haven't gotten that memo yet.





But my answer is no.
Reply:A bold NO to that! Our leaders have more respect if people believe they can accommodate more, and are near saint in character. At least a RADICAL and DRUG addict does not fit in.
Reply:Bush can't run again, although he managed to get elected twice consecutively.
Reply:I never voted for Bush. Not once. And I'm very proud of that fact.
Reply:Will you vote for a man who will die during election day and is completely like bush?
Reply:with the dems it all about show





no substance





get on Oprah, get on "The View"





its very transparent
Reply:Sure. People didn't seem to mind voting for "W", with the same baggage.
Reply:No, I won't.
Reply:I wasn't aware bush could run for a 3rd term
Reply:o*** no I wouldn't.

prostate